[Green] FW: Minutes of June 16 GSC meeting

[George Banziger]

Thanks, Adeline

    It seems that the issue of supporting candidates has morphed into what
to include in our GSC minutes generally.

    How do we define "GSC business?"


George & Gwen Banziger; 740-434-5685; 740-434-3354 (mobile)


On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 5:03 PM Adeline Bailey <adesign4199 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
> Scribe here. Perhaps we should eliminate the reports that are not directly
> GSC business actions. We can still hear about them at the meeting and offer
> them to our members as separate items of interest (George always sends them
> out to the committee anyway), but let the minutes themselves reflect only
> GSC business. So Rebecca's report would be appropriate to include, but
> George's, not so much. *Please note; as a committee, we took no action in
> support of any candidate, issue, or legislative measures; we only heard
> from George about actions of the groups he reported on.* {One possible
> exception -  I wrote that we talked about Kripchak's ideas being more in
> line with GSC goals - I think that would be a biased statement.) As for
> discussing candidates by name, as long as it's just the facts of who was
> elected and who was appointed to various positions, I don't think that is
> biased, but I am open to changing if others see it differently.
> Maybe we should be more formal about our "official business" as well. It
> was my intention to put forward a motion regarding our taking the lead on
> the Climate Justice Revival, but somehow we went right by that. Hence, I
> called it a consensus decision.
> Important question: Shall I edit the minutes along the lines of my idea of
> bias in the minutes? Easy enough to do! Mostly deleting stuff (George's
> reports; tone down Kripchak discussion; take another look at wording about
> Rulli and Chavez ) Let me know and I'll get right on it!
> Adeline
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Virus-free.www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_-4892576947795848523_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 3:45 PM George Banziger via Green <green at fuusm.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Debra, Dawn:
>>
>>     It occurs to me that we might be taking some risk to our non-profit
>> status by mentioning specific candidates for public office in our meeting
>> notes. Does anyone (Kat maybe?) know about this?
>>
>>
>> George & Gwen Banziger; 740-434-5685; 740-434-3354 (mobile)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 1:32 PM frogdlm--- via Green <green at fuusm.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Adeline, thank you for your incredible scribe work.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here are the minutes from our recent meeting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Debra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>>
>>> Virus-free.www.avast.com
>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Green mailing list
>>> Green at fuusm.org
>>> http://fuusm.org/mailman/listinfo/green_fuusm.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Green mailing list
>> Green at fuusm.org
>> http://fuusm.org/mailman/listinfo/green_fuusm.org
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fuusm.org/pipermail/green_fuusm.org/attachments/20240621/df80a349/attachment.htm>