[Fuusmchat] (no subject)
Ted Goertzel
tedgoertzel at gmail.com
Fri Jul 28 06:51:46 CDT 2023
One member told me after the session that she thought it would be
embarrassing for the Church if members of the public saw a story about
this. It was more a matter of embarrassing the church than of personal
embarrassment. Another said she thought a story should wait until after the
second meeting. A summary might be useful for anyone who missed the first
meeting but attends the second, like the clips you get at the beginning of
a TV show that review what happened in previous episodes. But there aren't
likely to be many in that situation.
I'm only the editor of Confluence, I don't usually write the stories and I
don't need to write summary of this session, I just thought it would be
helpful. If one of the organizers wants to write one, perhaps after the
second session, I can include it in the September issue. I can also put in
a link to anyone's statement if they want to send it to me. But this can
certainly wait until September when the group has had time to decide what
it wants to do, if anything.
Human motivation is complex, we all have different layers of motivation. I
wonder, for example, about the motivation for not making these sessions
accessible on Zoom. We spent a lot on that technology and Ralph was in the
control booth. Why not use it? Is it because Kat might have watched it?
Zoom wouldn't be available to the general public. This affects me because I
am one of the ones who is in line to speak at the next meeting, but I
expect to be in Washington DC.
Why do we find it easier to talk about somebody behind their back than face
to face?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 7:32 PM nwolske17--- via fuusmchat <
fuusmchat at fuusm.org> wrote:
> To All:
>
> It was presumptuous of me to say I believed I was speaking for everyone
> when I replied to Ted’s message regarding understanding that people
> might be embarrassed if a summary of last night’s discussion were in the
> Confluence.
>
> Although I still don’t believe embarrassment was anyone’s reason for
> voting down the suggestion, it was wrong (and perhaps a tad obnoxious) for
> me to use those words, and I apologize if anyone was offended.
>
> Peace ❤️
>
>
> Nancy Lee
>
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=Global_Acquisition_YMktg_315_Internal_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=Global_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100000604&af_sub5=EmailSignature__Static_>
> _______________________________________________
> fuusmchat mailing list
> fuusmchat at fuusm.org
> http://fuusm.org/mailman/listinfo/fuusmchat_fuusm.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fuusm.org/pipermail/fuusmchat_fuusm.org/attachments/20230728/5e8a8aff/attachment.htm>
More information about the fuusmchat
mailing list