[Fuusm-l] Dialogue Sessions Summary

[Chris Hoke]

THANK YOU Darryl, Karen, and Nancy!

Chris Hoke

 

From: Fuusm-l <fuusm-l-bounces at fuusm.org> On Behalf Of Darryl Ting via Fuusm-l
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 2:44 PM
To: FUUSM e-mail <fuusm-l at fuusm.org>
Subject: [Fuusm-l] Dialogue Sessions Summary

 

FUUSM Community,

 

The following is a summary of the recently completed Dialogue Sessions.

 

 

THE DIALOGUE SESSIONS

 

BACKGROUND

In response to a significant level of frustration within the congregation from people feeling they have not been heard, a motion was passed at the Annual Meeting in April to have “congregational style” meetings for the purpose of congregational feedback on the minister’s performance and specifically excluding the minister.  The absence of the minister was believed to be necessary so that those who wanted to speak during the meetings could do so openly.

 

The Board subsequently determined they could not call a congregational meeting and exclude the minister. And the minister declined to voluntarily exclude herself. 

 

So, an independent steering team was formed to implement the motion.  And, after talking with a church member, Rev. Kat reconsidered and agreed to absent herself.  The Dialogue Sessions proceeded as unofficial congregational meetings and were scheduled for July 26 and August 23.   A third session, September 6, was added later.  

 

A BRIEF SUMMARY

Attendance at the sessions was good … 49, 36 and 43 for sessions 1, 2 and 3 respectively.  That size is equal to or greater than the typical attendance at annual meetings.  The content of the group in attendance was also significant … they were a large portion of the hands-on core of the church.  By size and content, the voice of this group was substantial.

 

We first heard statements of first-hand experiences from a total of 24 people.  Positive and negative experiences were about evenly split.  And an overwhelming majority of the attendees said they were better informed after this sharing.

 

We then heard a summary of the Board’s Ministerial Performance Review Process and a summary of the latest evaluation.  This process is only in its second year, and most attendees were unaware of how it worked.  There were lots of questions and comments on it.  

 

We then had an open comment period.  10-15 people shared their views on the minister’s performance.  These were mainly people who had not made first-hand experience statements.  So we heard from just about the entire group.

 

And in the last session, we were able to draw a conclusion from these sessions.  Based on the first-hand experiences and using Unitarian Universalist Ministers Association resource material, the group did reach a preliminary finding of a behavioral issue.  Instead of finalizing the finding, the group chose a healing approach and voted in favor of this recommendation to the Board … We recommend the Board contact our UUA representative within 1 week and ask for advice and assistance on this matter.  

 

The group also voted in favor of a second recommendation to the Board … We recommend the Board contact our UUA representative for advice on how we can give input to and discuss issues related to our minister’s performance.

 

Follow-up … The Board has contacted our UUA representative, and next steps are being discussed.

 

TAKE-AWAYS

 

As the steering team, we acknowledge that these Dialogue Sessions have created turmoil in our congregation.  Some people are upset because they view the sessions as a trial and that Rev. Kat’s absence was unfair.  A more accurate analogy would be a grand jury … to investigate and see if anything is really there.  By intent and conduct, that is what we tried to do … investigate.

 

There are reasons to look beyond the current turmoil and be hopeful about our future.  During these sessions, the true character of our congregation was revealed … a group of people who are dedicated to our affirmation and who have become bonded to each other through trying to live it.  Even in disagreement, people listened, became better informed, treated each other with respect, and discussed and decided TOGETHER.  And in the end, WE listened to our good UU hearts, and WE chose a healing approach for ourselves and Rev. Kat.  

 

We are very grateful to all who invested their time and patience to participate in these important meetings.

 

Your Dialogue Sessions Steering Team,

Karen Binkley, Nancy Luthy, Darryl Ting

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fuusm.org/pipermail/fuusm-l_fuusm.org/attachments/20230921/a3d0b6ba/attachment.htm>