[Council] info attached to OS for April 30th

[Annie Warmke]

It turns out I am the only one that received it until tomorrow when it 
is supposed to be given out with the OS.  I will try to download it when 
I get a minute and send it to everyone.  In the meantime this is what it 
references:  It is a copy of the Congregational Covenant dates 10/19/03 
FUUSM Doc. #13 Page 1

On 4/29/2023 1:00 PM, Ted Goertzel via Council wrote:
> Annie,
> I'm curious what you're talking about, I haven't seen such a statement 
> and can't find it in my email.  How did you get it? Can you forward it 
> to me?
> Ted
>
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 8:48 AM Annie Warmke via Council 
> <council at fuusm.org> wrote:
>
>     I have tried to understand the reasoning behind the attachment
>     that will be handed out tomorrow at the Sunday service.  It is not
>     clear to me.  No one signed it or is listed as a contact for comment.
>
>     It seems to have some intent but it isn't clear.  The document is
>     all over the place in what it is trying to convey.  It feels like
>     the intent, and I'm reading into this, is to squelch disagreement
>     with how things are being done, or perhaps how the minister is
>     leading or not leading.  Is this in response to my report last
>     Sunday or Darryl's ideas or something else? I'd like it to be
>     clear what brought this about and the solution they are looking
>     for because it feels like it is saying we have no right to correct
>     wrongs, disagree with old-fashioned ways of doing business, or
>     with the minister.
>
>     This message is the type of thing that just feeds the gossip and
>     behind-the-back comments.  If there's an issue let's put it out
>     there.  Let's state it clearly.  Let's deal with it.  If we let
>     this type of communication, or way of communicating pass how do we
>     move forward in a positive way?
>
>     What is the next step?  I have filled out my minister's job review
>     survey and I am sitting on it for a few days to make sure I am
>     clear in my responses, and not overlooking what needs to be said. 
>     It can be so easy to back down from a position that is not
>     popular, and I am determined to remain as neutral as possible in
>     the observations I offer as the leader of the Chalice Lighter
>     Project.  Annie Warmke
>
>
>     <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>     	Virus-free.www.avg.com
>     <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
>
>     <#m_1986115446921716294_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Council mailing list
>     Council at fuusm.org
>     http://fuusm.org/mailman/listinfo/council_fuusm.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at fuusm.org
> http://fuusm.org/mailman/listinfo/council_fuusm.org

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fuusm.org/pipermail/council_fuusm.org/attachments/20230429/f228aeee/attachment.htm>